“The only church that illuminates is a burning one” - Spanish Anarchist Buenaventura Durruti
Peter Rollins explains Pyro-Theology in this video from Poets, Prophets, & Preachers.
________
Have we become so captive to structures and traditions that fire is the only way we can be freed?
Is ours a church in need of a theological arsonist?
Or, perhaps, would setting such a fire succeed in burning away the clutter only at the cost of taking us with it? (HT: The Pangea Blog)
In anticipation of the release of Insurrection [which I reviewed last week by comparing it with sour beer], theological arsonist Peter Rollins has been releasing a series of videos.
The videos are from the Poets, Prophets, and Preachers seminar, which Peter spoke at alongside Rob Bell – you can find Rob’s sessions here.
I don’t always agree with Rollins, but then again he [admittedly] doesn’t always agree with himself. So grab a Guinness – Rollins will make more sense if you do – and feel free share your thoughts/questions/critiques once you check out these clips.
___________________
The DisCourses – Rollins explaining how the ikon community was founded [‘I’d love to do something in this pub, but I have no idea what’] and the sorts of practices ikon engages in.
The Power of Parable – It is in parable and storytelling that Rollins is in his element, and here he shares some provocative examples of the role of the parable in the church.
Transformance Art – A few examples of what a “typical” service at ikon looks like, and a different way of going about communicating our faith.
Peter Rollins’ writing is like a sour beer.
Sour beers are daring, provocative, and shake up all your preconceptions of what a beer can be. They are also not the sort of beer you are going to want to recommend to a novice, or to drink on a regular basis.
That would be, more or less, how I felt while reading Rollins latest book, Insurrection
____________________
In the pages of Insurrection, Rollins challenges us to ask what truly motivates our faith, and then deconstructs our idolatrous images of the divine.
Using continental philosophy, postmodern critique, and a fair bit of existentialism, Rollins makes a provocative suggestion – many of us who claim to have faith are in fact using God as a means to an end. Faced with our own mortality and unfulfilled desires, we create for ourselves a deus ex machina, a divine being who steps in to ensure our life has comfort, meaning, and hope.
It matters little if we actively believe in this god, because others (our church, the pastor) believe on our behalf, and by entering into the play-acting each week we are able to attain all the same advantages whether we truly believe or not.
But instead of running from the pain and despair of life, Rollins insists that the Cross and Resurrection lead us to embrace them and in doing so rob them of their power.
He argues that while religion is the giving up of all for God, at the Cross we give up even God himself, joining Christ in his cry of forsakenness, and in the process experience the presence of God in his very absence. Resurrection then becomes a fresh start where we see God not as the one who calls us to love, but as the one present in the very act of love itself.
As the book continues Rollins leverages these ideas in a number of ways, but his central point seems to be this – we affirm our beliefs not through our words but through our deeds, and the role of theology is to be a pyrotheology which is always burning down the structures of our faith and in the process finding truth.
In his words “The truth arises in the very conflict itself, the conflict that drives us onward.”
____________________
Truth be told, I quite enjoyed Insurrection. Rollins is a talented writer, with a knack for telling stories, and it did indeed set fire to some old assumptions while encouraging me to examine the motives of my faith.
But like I said, it was also a bit like drinking a sour beer. There’s a place for it, and it can even be a needed change, but it’s not what I’d build a foundation on.
In fact a foundation is exactly what Insurrection does not provide. It is an incendiary work, an act of theological arson, and while that may be necessary at times I find myself growing tired of constant deconstruction that leads to…more deconstruction.
We can burn down the wreckage of the old structure, but are no better off until we build something new in it’s place.
Also, I’m not as sold on existentialism as Rollins seems to be. It has it’s place, but when used as the lens through which we view our faith, it seems liable to lead us in all sorts of unhelpful directions.
So, would I recommend Insurrection? Yes, it’s a thought provoking book and a worthwhile dialogue partner. Just don’t make it your session beer.
