Archive

Kingdom of God

christ_the_kingMany Christmas songs celebrate the coming of Christ the King – but what does such a kingship mean?

In the Christianity Today article Worship Christ the Newborn King, David Neff uses Pius XI’s Quas Primas to discusses the ever-complex relationship between Church, State, and the Lordship of Christ .

“‘the Church, founded by Christ as a perfect society, has a natural and inalienable right to perfect freedom and immunity from the power of the state; and that in fulfilling the task committed to her by God of teaching, ruling, and guiding to eternal bliss those who belong to the kingdom of Christ, she cannot be subject to any external power.’ [Pope Pius XI, 1925]

…Pius was disturbed by nationalism, and so are we whenever nationalist impulses trump the good of all people or loyalty to the international fellowship of Christian believers. In his day Italian, Spanish, and German nationalisms were all asserted at the expense of the church. When love of country is infused with a quasi-religious devotion, it threatens both the freedoms of citizens and the security of neighboring countries. The universal kingship of Christ supersedes our nation’s claims on our loyalties.”

The pope’s approach errs towards triumphalism, too much “already” and too little “not yet,” but his concern with nationalism and the danger of the Church placing the lordship of the State (or an ideology) over the lordship of Christ would seem to be as relevant today as it was in 1925.

From Cross-Shattered Christ.

“This is, moreover, as Pilate insisted, the King of the Jews. That kingship is not delayed by crucifixion; rather, crucifixion is the way this king rules. Crucifixion is kingdom come. This is the long-awaited apocalyptic moment. Here the powers of this world are forever subverted. Time is now redeemed through the raising up of Jesus on the cross. A new age has begun. The kingdom is here aborn, a new regime is inaugurated, creating a new way of life for those who worship and follow Jesus.” pg. 85

The particular way I’ve been attempting to address war, consumerism, and entertainment – as alternative liturgies to the liturgy of the Gospel community – owes a great deal to the writing of James K.A. Smith.

As Smith explains in this selection from Desiring the Kingdom, such cultural criticism serves as a sort of modern apocalyptic, an attempt to look anew at the empire and break through our sense of uncritical familiarity.

“One of the reasons I’m describing cultural practices and institutions as liturgies is to raise the stakes: I want to give you a heightened awareness of the religious nature of many of the cultural institutions we inhabit that you might not otherwise think of as having anything to do with Christian discipleship.

By religious I mean that they are institutions that command our allegiance, that vie for our passion, and that aim to capture our heart with a particular vision of the good life. They don’t want to just give us entertainment or an education; they want to make us into certain kinds of people.

So one of the most important aspects of this theology of culture is first a moment of recognition: recognizing cultural practices and rituals as liturgies. We need to recognize that these practices are not neutral or benign, but rather intentionally loaded to form us into certain kinds of people – to unwittingly make us disciples of rival kings and patriotic citizens of rival kingdoms.

Seeing the world and our culture in this way requires a kind of wake-up call, a strategy for jolting us out of our humdrum familiarity and comfort with these institutions in order to see them for what they are. Interestingly, Scripture has a way of doing this: it’s called apocalyptic literature.

Apocalyptic literature – the sort you find in the strange pages of Daniel and the book of Revelation – is a genre of Scripture that tries to get us to see (or see through) the empires that constitute our environment, in order to see them for what they really are.

Unfortunately, we associate apocalyptic literature with end-times literature, as if its goal were a matter of prediction. But this is a misunderstanding of the biblical genre; the point of apocalyptic is not prediction but unmasking – unveiling the realities around us for what they really are. So apocalyptic literature is a genre that tries to get us to see the world on a slant and thus see through the spin…

What we need, then, is a kind of contemporary apocalyptic – a language and a genre that sees through the spin and unveils for us the religious and idolatrous character of the contemporary institutions that constitute our own milieu.”

- from Desiring the Kingdom, pg. 90-92.

On the flight back from San Francisco I read Tom Wright’s latest book, Simply Jesus.

It’s a brilliant book, which provides both an ideal place to start wrestling with Wright’s larger theological project, and some new developments and emphases from his earlier books like The Challenge of Jesus.

I would highly recommend it to anyone, from the seeker looking to learn more about this Jesus fellow that Christians insist on talking about, to those who have spent years studying God’s word and want to see our Lord with fresh eyes.

In the two-part interview below, Wright summarizes some of the major themes of Simply Jesus, and suggests that in some ways the Church has gotten Jesus quite wrong. (HT: Kurt Willems)

“I begin with a point which may seem strange and even potentially heterodox, but which I believe is the high road to a genuine, canonical orthodoxy. The Gospels are not primarily written to convince their readers that Jesus of Nazareth is the second person of the Trinity.

They are not talking about that. Rather, they are written to convince their readers that he was really inaugurating the kingdom of God – the kingdom of Israel’s God – on earth as in heaven.

That is front and center in the Synoptic Gospels, and not far behind in John. But it is almost entirely absent from ‘the tradition’ – as witness the entire line of thought from the great creeds to the Chalcedonian Definition through to much dogmatic theology in our own day.

Jesus as kingdom-bringer has been screened out of the church’s dogmatic proclamation. The church has managed to talk about Jesus while ignoring what the Gospels say about him.”

- N.T. Wright, Jesus, Paul and the People of God (pg. 133)

Thoughts?

Ours is a generation longing for an eschatology. And, as we think afresh about the Second Advent and the book of Revelation, I believe Tom Wright may be just the person to help us along the way.

If those topics are of interest to you, and you find yourself with some free time over the holiday, do yourself a favor and watch this lecture Tom gave at Duke Divinity School entitled “Revelation and the Christian Hope: Political Implications of the Revelation of John.

 

Thanks to Daniel James Levy at Near Emmaus for bringing this to my attention!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 83 other followers