Books, Links, and Ramblings
My reading has taken on a historical theme recently, with Pelikan’s The Growth of Medieval Theology and MacCulloch’s The Reformation
currently occupying any free time I can find.
Next up, Gordon’s biography of Calvin.
Also of note, I just finished Jamie Smith’s The Fall of Interpretation (which was brilliant), and am adding a couple volumes by Barth and Torrance to the top of my reading list.
This morning I stumbled across the blog The Evangelical Calvinist. So far I’ve only read a couple posts – Thomas Torrance’s View of Scripture as ‘Human’ and Calvin: Right and Wrong on Predestination, Election – but it looks promising and ties into my other reading well at the moment.
I couldn’t be happier that the election is over, but I continue to find the apocalyptic language of both the Religious Right and the Religious Left incredibly disheartening. If Jesus is Lord means anything, it ought to mean the Church participates in a different sort of politics. As Augustine argued, Christians are part of a different polis, and that should determine how we approach the polis of the world – which one would hope leaves little room for uncritical partisan loyalties.
Speaking of Augustine (and Barth, Torrence, Smith, Calvin, the Reformation, etc.), might there be way of being [faithfully] “Reformed” that looks quite different from the way Piper and Co. have defined that term?
I believe so, but I am still wrestling with what that might look like.
On a tangentially related note – it seems I’m not the only one tentatively exploring a more traditioned stream of the faith these days. I have only anecdotal evidence for this, but it seems many who were engaged with emgerent have slowly and quietly begun moving towards something else. Of course, there is a significant difference between taking your next step in a journey and recanting your previous step.

Thanks for the linkage, Simon.
By the way, to your question about being more faithfully Reformed. I believe the answer to your question is a resounding, YES! That’s what we are about with Evangelical Calvinism. Karl Barth makes a distinction in his book ‘The Theology of the Reformed Confessions’ between the spirit of being Reformed, and the letter. The former, I would argue, is the best of being Reformed, which means to work within and from that tradition, but to do so in a way that truly walks in the Reformed reality of ‘always reforming’ per the dictates of scripture and the Lord revealed and borne witness to therein. I have written a lot on this at my blog, and then our recently released book also endeavors to flesh this out further; esp. chapter 15 where Myk Habets and I present our 15 Theses for what it means, for us, to be Evangelical Calvinists.
If you want to know what it means to be more faithfully Reformed; then I’d say you’re on the right path given the apparent fact that you are reading Barth and Torrance. I am what you might say ‘Torrancean’ or ‘Torrancian’ in theological trajectory, and so you will find quite a few posts at my site that cover Thomas Torrance’s theology.
One of the prominent differences between following something like Piper and Barth/Torrance & co. is a disparate view of God, and then the prolegomena (or theological method) that follows from this variance. I have written a few posts critiquing John Piper’s ‘two willed God’, here are the links:
http://growrag.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/%C2%A73-matt-chandlers-and-john-pipers-two-willed-god-there-is-a-history/
http://growrag.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/%C2%A72-matt-chandlers-and-john-pipers-two-willed-god-there-is-a-problem/
http://growrag.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/john-calvin-contra-two-wills-in-god-methodology/
I have more, but this should suffice as a sampling.
Peace.
Cant wait. Just ordered Reformation from amazon. Cover totally sold me