of Passion Plays and War Movies.
Whips, fists, and jeers adding to the torture.
A crown of thorns pressed down.
Nails pierced through hands and feet.
Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ was nothing if not explicit about the violence of Good Friday.
But this dramatic portrayal was in a sense nothing new; it came as part of a long tradition of reenacting the crucifixion that stretches back to the Middle Ages.
Over time, these reenactments became known as passion plays.
They served as a reminder of the sacrifice, the pain and suffering the Messiah underwent on our behalf, and the victory on the other side of apparent defeat.
They also developed a darker side, and were at times manipulated to stoke hatred against Jews or enemies of Christendom.
Used for good or ill, passion plays were not primarily interested in making a cognitive argument. They were appealing to the emotions, the heart, and the imagination.
I want to suggest that, in much the same way, war movies have come to serve as secular passion plays.
While not making a cognitive argument for war (few of us would pack a theater for such a lecture), war movies appeal on a deeper level – shaping our hearts and our imaginations.
We are reminded of the sacrifice of war (which I would argue is itself an alternative liturgy to the sacrifice of Christ), the glory of battle, and the honor of dying and killing (or having others die and kill on our behalf).
It matters little if the war depicted involves our particular empire or nation-state. If it does so much the better, but on an emotional level the connection is easy enough to make.
Whether the movie features an established power confronting a rising threat, or a band of courageous rebels taking on the system, both feed into the narrative of empire, and both serve to legitimate war on a precognitive level so convincing we can hardly imagine an alternative.
As we leave the theater we remember the sacrifice, are encouraged never to let it be in vain by failing to repeat the sacrifice when war approaches in our generation, and are thereby told again of the necessity of the sacrificial system as a whole, all while being awakened once more to an awareness of who our enemies are.
Even (and perhaps especially) if such explicitly religious language never enters our minds, the liturgy of this secular passion play does its job well.
Now none of this means I expect to never watch another war movie, anymore than I expect never to return to the mall which has its own set of liturgical practices. But it is important that we realize we are being taught by such films, not on the level of a lecture but on the level of the heart and the imagination, on the level of myth.


As you transitioned from the passion to war thoughts, a quote from Fight Club immediately came to mind:
‘We’re the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War’s a spiritual war… our Great Depression is our lives. We’ve all been raised on television to believe that one day we’d all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won’t. And we’re slowly learning that fact. And we’re very, very pissed off.’
What these movies and the passion itself taps into, like you pointed out is in many ways our desire to be part of a dynamic narrative – a larger story of meaning. Since we have no great war, no great depression to overcome like those who have come before us – the draw to these films, these stories becomes even more compelling. I might venture the rise within Christendom of war type language and the ultra-masculine movements feed into this with many of their illustrations on how to live stemming from these very movies.
Your line ‘it is important that we realize we are being taught by such films, not on the level of a lecture but on the level of the heart and the imagination, on the level of myth’ sums it up greatly – that an awareness of how everything we consume and encounter effect the lens which we view our lives and God.
“I might venture the rise within Christendom of war type language and the ultra-masculine movements feed into this with many of their illustrations on how to live stemming from these very movies.”
I quite agree, a generation of men struggling to find their place and purpose is easily attracted by such language. My fear is that in uncritically adopting the warfare motif, the ‘manliness’ being offered is bound to look little like the example of Christ.
Pingback: the forty-second formica friday | see preston blog
Pingback: The Sunday List ~ Empire Narratives and Lost Coins | Seth Haines
Pingback: Seth Haines | The Sunday List ~ Empire Narratives and Lost Coins